Livelihood Options

NTFP-based livelihood development for the tribal communities
HomeLivelihood

NTFPs: A Lifeline for Tribal Livelihoods

Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) encompass all biological materials other than timber extracted from forests. Globally, NTFPs are considered a cornerstone for the sustainable livelihood development of tribal communities. They provide a vital source of income, food and nutrition security, especially for landless or marginal landholding tribal communities. Thus, NTFPs provide multifaceted opportunities to poverty alleviation and economic empowerment for forest-dependent populations.
A Diverse Treasury of Resources
NTFPs include a wide array of items essential for the subsistence and economic activities of tribal communities, including

NTFP and tribal livelihood

The sustainable utilization of NTFPs provides several avenues for the economic and social development of tribal communities:

It is estimated that approximately 275 million rural people in India rely on NTFPs for subsistence and cash income (Pandey et al., 2016). Several studies pointed that nearly 70% of NTFPs are collected from the country’s tribal belt. They provide a vital source of either primary or supplementary income, acting as a crucial livelihood safety net (Areki and Cunningham, 2010; Babulo et al., 2009; Mahapatra et al., 2005; Marshall et al., 2006; Shackleton et al., 2008).

A study conducted by IBRAD in 1990 in Jamboni Range, West Bengal, revealed that nearly two-thirds of the household income of the tribal households was generated by NTFPs. This explicitly provides year-round livelihood support for these tribal communities.

Challenges in NTFP-based livelihood development
Despite the immense potential, the development of NTFP-based livelihoods faces several challenges, including:

Case Study of NTFP based Livelihood Development among Hill Kharia PVTGs

IBRAD is working with the Hill Kharia PVTGs in Boniya Basa village in Mayurbhanj District, Odisha. It was found that the PVTGs rely heavily on NTFPs like honey, resin, and arrowroot. However, they sell these products to local traders and middlemen for very low prices. This indicates a significant opportunity to improve their NTFP-based livelihood opportunities. Additionally, destructive harvesting practices, such as removing bark from trees like Kudchi and improperly extracting arrowroot tubers, are causing serious damage to local biodiversity.
Situation Analysis

The first step was to conduct a situation analysis of the village, understanding the level of dependence of the PVTGs on these NTFPs and the root cause analysis to overcome the challenges.

The Hill Kharia people sell their NTFPs to individual middlemen who visit the village, collecting products from door to door. Due to a lack of bargaining power, villagers are forced to sell even high-value products like honey and arrowroot at low prices. The study also found that despite women being the primary collectors of NTFPs, they have no direct dealings with middlemen and lack a decision-making role in the marketing process.

Male Livelihood from NTFPs
Honey and Jhuna (resin) are the two main NTFPs that men collect and sell. A limited number of men are involved in honey collection; however, those who do typically gather about one quintal (100 kg) per year. They sell it at an average rate of Rs 350 per kg, resulting in an annual income of approximately Rs 35,000 from honey and Rs 10,000 from Jhuna.
Female Livelihood from NTFPs

Women in Bania Basa, regardless of age, collect a variety of NTFPs, including Palo (arrowroot), Kanga Root, Mallika Root, Kudchi Skin, Ramadantuni Root, Bheru, mushrooms, and Kasaphala. The income varies among women, as some may earn more from Palo while others earn more from Mallika Root or Kudchi skin.

Skilled women who can venture deep into the forest can earn around Rs 300 per visit, while older or less skilled women earn about Rs 100 per visit. On average, women dedicate about 170 days per year to NTFP collection, with an average earning of Rs 200 per visit, resulting in an average annual income of Rs 34,000.

Key Challenges in the NTFP Value Chain
  1. High Intermediary Margins: Middlemen and retailers take significant cuts of the profit, with margins of approximately 33% and 20% respectively. This inflates the final cost for consumers while leaving the tribal communities with low returns.
  2. Lack of Bargaining Power: Tribal communities have very little power to negotiate prices. They are often forced to sell their products at a low rate because nearby villages do the same, and there is no effective coordination among villages to collectively raise prices.
  3. Limited Awareness of Product Value: The communities themselves are often unaware of the true market value of their products. As a result, they do not push for higher prices or see the need to increase them.
  4. Tensions with Forest Officials: Due to a lack of clear demarcation between the buffer and core zones of the Reserve Forest, PVTGs sometimes enter prohibited core areas to collect NTFPs. This unintentional trespass creates conflict and tension with the forest department.
  5. Destructive Harvesting Practices: Certain harvesting methods are harmful to the ecosystem. For example, trees are cut for Palo cultivation, and deep cuts are made into immature trees to extract Jhuna or Kudchi skin. Additionally, women often dig out significant portions of mallika roots, which can cause the tree to fall. These practices are considered destructive and threaten biodiversity.
  6. Low Mobility and Aspirations Among Women: It was observed that women have very low mobility, with none having ever left the village or expressing a desire to travel, even for a vacation. They also do not aspire to take on leadership roles within the community.

Steps followed for forming and strengthening the community institutions following SAPTAPADI, seven sequential steps

Step 1 – Focus on the problem and identification of the SICO–Eco Chain Approach
The Eco Chain Approach of IBRAD (Roy and Mukhopadhyay, 2021) is developed for changing the worldview of the people towards the conservation of natural ecosystems and identification of proactive community organisers as SICO (Self-Initiated Community Organisers). The Eco Chain Approach, combined with the SAPTAPADI model’s seven sequential steps for building community institutions, enabled the community to focus on the problem of destructive NTFP harvesting and the need to enhance the value chain. It also facilitated a realisation that women needed to be involved in decision-making roles and that the forest, as the source of NTFPs, must be conserved.
Step 2 – Formation of a cohesive group of like-minded people to work together to solve the problem.
Interestingly, women members of the village came forward and formed the group
Step 3 – Role, Rules and Control Mechanism
Group members assigned roles of being President, Secretary and Treasurer, framed rules and control mechanisms for building their institution following SAPTAPADI, the seven sequential steps were followed.
Step 4 – Training and capacity building
Members are trained on group management, non-destructive harvesting of NTFPs and plantation techniques.
Step 5 – Trade off analysis

To understand the specific challenges men and women face in collecting and marketing NTFPs, separate focus group discussions were held. These discussions helped to clarify the gender-specific contributions to this labour.

Additionally, Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) exercises, such as resource mapping and seasonal calendars, were used to involve villagers directly in gathering and analysing relevant information.

During this process, villagers were also encouraged to calculate the long-term losses caused by destructive NTFP harvesting, and to compare these losses to the short-term gains of quick income. This analysis led the community to reach a consensus on the need for non-destructive harvesting practices.

Step 6 – Convergence of resources

To understand the specific challenges men and women face in collecting and marketing NTFPs, separate focus group discussions were held. These discussions helped to clarify the gender-specific contributions to this labour.

Additionally, Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) exercises, such as resource mapping and seasonal calendars, were used to involve villagers directly in gathering and analysing relevant information.

During this process, villagers were also encouraged to calculate the long-term losses caused by destructive NTFP harvesting, and to compare these losses to the short-term gains of quick income. This analysis led the community to reach a consensus on the need for non-destructive harvesting practices.

To reduce the significant dependence on the middlemen, a database was created for the private players and NGOs to convert them into potential new buyers of the NTFP and a marketing linkage was developed.

Economic return from developing market linkages

The new marketing channel has had a significant positive impact on the income of the villagers:

  • Honey: The price for honey has increased by Rs 100 per kg, from Rs 350 to Rs 450 per kg. This has led to an average annual income increase of Rs 10,000 per household involved in honey collection.
  • Other NTFPs: The price for Palo has increased by Rs 100 per kg, from Rs 500 to Rs 600. This, along with a similar price increase for jhuna (resin), has resulted in an additional annual income of Rs 1,250 per household for 90% of the village’s households.
Learning
  • NTFPs are not just a supplementary resource but a cornerstone of survival for tribal communities. The reliance is particularly high for landless or marginal landholders, making NTFP management a direct path to poverty alleviation and food security.
  • That building community institutions and actively involving them in biodiversity conservation, identifying species with market potential, understanding the backward and forward linkages and market quality requirements are crucial for developing effective strategies to improve the NTFP value chain.
  • A major learning is that collective action enabled the women to move from simply collecting products to actively participating in marketing decisions, a role they were previously excluded from. This proves that creating women -led institutions can be a key to shifting power dynamics.
  • The case study also highlights that NTFP management cannot be separated from environmental conservation. By involving the community in a Trade off analysis about long-term losses versus short-term gains, the project fostered an understanding of the need for non-destructive harvesting. This demonstrates that sustainable livelihoods and environmental stewardship are mutually dependent.